Life's Cheat Sheet
  • Nazm
  • Poems
  • Life Stories
  • Opinion
  • She
    • Khayal Ata Hai
    • She
    • Feminism Shorts
    • Pasta Do-pyaza
  • Contact
  • Blog

Making Sense of : 'Being Seen'

5/18/2015

1 Comment

 
Remember the first time we drew something  on a paper, as far as our memory can tell, we went to our parents to show it. ‘Look Mumma’, ‘Papa dekho’ maine kya banaya ( Look Papa, see what I drew!) And in return our parents appreciated us, kissed us, hugged us and we knew we were loved. That and more is what I call a human need to be ‘seen’, to be witnessed by someone.

When we grew up, some of our childhood needs stayed as is. What is different is our expression of that need. We still want to be seen as significant, as loved unconditionally and hugged tightly for who we are, but that simple pen and paper is just not enough. In the absence of close relationships, the world becomes our audience. And we compete with 7 billion people for significance. Why should the world care for us? Day in and out we want to show the world, our success, our talent, how smart we are. We are scared that otherwise, we will not be loved. Of course, not everyone does it to the same degree. And in the process of showing the world who we are, there is a possibility of losing people who could be the very witnesses to our life. Our best friends, that we haven’t spoken to in weeks because our time zones do not match and we are too busy. Our mother who cannot understand our work any more because we never had the patience to take her along, and she still stands there asking us the very same questions, that to her, are the only way to show love, ‘the food questions.’  ‘Beta khana kha liya? ‘ ( Have you eaten son? ’) Sometimes a partner comes into our lives and begins to witness us.  If we allow ourselves to stand still and be seen, those moments are the most cherished ones in anyone’s life. But then the anxiety seeps in and we are so scared to pause, to see,to be seen.

Work is meaningful, it is important and so is creativity. Most of us do not want to go back to the hunting gathering stage of civilisation. We all need progress. But these are vehicles our wisdom and awareness should drive. There are many of us who do not realise, that in between somewhere, we unconsciously board the bus of insecurity, a bus that we cannot steer. The bus that takes its own route, following the principles of an unaware aggregate, a route that appears safe but might just not be meant for us.

Most of us eventually want to go home,the one place where we are loved, are significant, are understood and truly ‘seen’.  But following the wrong Gods, we may never reach home.
1 Comment

Making Sense of : Money

5/13/2015

2 Comments

 
On a conversation this morning. Making Sense of Money :

Money has always intrigued me. In my younger years, I desired it for what it could do, disliked it for what it made people do and absolutely despised it for what it, inturn, made some people become.

It would be foolish of me to question the necessity of the existence of money. We did live without money in a certain way and we can still live without it in very specific simple ways, but in a society as complex as ours that has a constant need to connect more and more, there is need for an exchange instrument. Currently money is the social instrument that helps us interact in our materialistic world. It is a sort of technology that has evolved over time and has proven useful. As long as we eat and breathe we need money , as a society, or something like money. So if man were only matter, more money should indeed have been the sole human pursuit.

The news, good or bad, is that man is both matter and spirit.

And the limitation of money is, that it can only be earned and spent in the materialistic world. It might serve, at best, an indirect purpose in the spiritual world, but many a times as we tend to use it, it proves a hindrance in pursuing something that is worth the while for the spirit.

We all need some money. It is the incessant ‘more’ in the money, something that has become the norm, which poses a huge crisis. Wanting ‘more’ than someone else is a whole new catastrophe altogether,for obvious reasons. And sometimes being too involved with money, we allow our spirits to go impoverished, which to me, essentially, is a lopsided human existence. Like any instrument money needs to be handled with care, used to it's fullest but kept short of addiction. We have to decide for ourselves. If our parents need a place to live in, buying them a home is as spiritual as it can get.  However, it is tougher to decide if the latest I-phone or that expensive car and yacht is worth the effort. We need to think if more days at a serene Darjeeling and Ladakh would do for us and should we let the universe decide on the euro trip or is the private chopper to Brazil more important than a week’s vacation with our parents in Kanpur.

If you love sailing on the sea, by all means go for that yacht, if there is a serious need for speed, of course that sports car is worth trying for. However, if you like your imagination to fly and taking a walk down the woods fulfills your spirit, maybe you need more time than money. If the smell of books is better than that latest Versace perfume, you need to rethink ‘how much money’ and ‘how much time’. After all, you need to read the books you buy too. Do you like the spark in the eye of a child that just learnt something new from you? Probably more than the auroras in Norway, maybe you need to work someplace, that allows you to work with kids, or spend time with your own rather than fund your trip to Norway. You might be able to go to Norway, none the less. The universe has its ways.

Money also does not get us any more real love than we give out in the world. The currency there is character and that is one thing money can’t buy.

Count yourself lucky if you can manage to have both the ‘ more’ money and the time to spend it for spiritual blossoming. Most of the times that is not the case. Such is life :)
2 Comments

कम्पट और candy 

4/8/2015

5 Comments

 

कम्पट का खटमीठा स्वाद तो सिर्फ कम्पट बोल कर ही आता है। जो दाँतों के बीच दबकर कट्ट की आवाज़ करे वह कम्पट, जो गाँव में चाचा की गुमटी से चार आने में खरीदा, या जो कानपूर में दादाजी कलेक्टर गंज से हमारे लिए पैकेट में भर कर ले आये वो रंग बिरंगे कम्पट। कम्पट को 'candy' कह कर हम दोनों का ही मज़ा ख़राब कर देते हैं। 

भाषा सिर्फ बात चीत का माध्यम नहीं होती , भाषा शब्दों से जीवन की तस्वीर खींचती है। भाषा हमारे भूत की साक्षी है , हमारे भविष्य का कुछ हद तक दर्शन भी। हमारी नानी हमारी भाषा जानकर वर्तमान में सहज महसूस कर सकती हैं, पर उनके संस्कारों का मज़ा चखना है तो उनकी भाषा को जानना, और उससे प्रेम करना आवश्यक है। 

मैंने अपना अधिकांश बचपन, जब हम भाषा सीखते हैं, एक गाँव में बिताया। पढाई मुख्यतः कानपुर शहर में अंग्रेजी में हुई, cindrella की कहानियां पढ़ते हुए। जब माँ ने 'Little Red  Riding Hood' को नन्ही लाल चुन्नी कहा तो मुझे लगा माँ को अंग्रेजी माध्यम में पढ़तीं तो कितना अच्छा होता।  अतः मेरी पहली कविता ' a cat on a mat' थी। अंग्रेजी में कहानियां भी लिखकर कई इनाम भी जीते, अंग्रेजी में अंक भी अधिकतर बाकी छात्रों से ज़्यादा मिलते थे मुझे। किन्तु जैसे जैसे लिखने का शौक बढ़ा मैं वो सारी छोटी छोटी चीज़ें तलाशने लगी जो मेरे बचपन की गवाह थीं। शब्दावली में कुछ शब्द तोह अंग्रेजी में मिले, पर बुकनू-रोटी का चटखारा, गरम लाही की महक,कल्लू चाचा के यहाँ खाए हुए भुने आलू का सोंधापन, बारिश में छप्पर के नीचे वह गीली मिटटी की खुशबू , मेरे दादी के होठों पे सूखती पान की लाली, ये उपमाएं अंग्रेजी में या तो थी ही नहीं, या हो सकता है इनकी जानकारी मुझे न हो. 

जैसे जैसे मन का थान खोला, कई भावनाएं ऐसी आ निकलीं जिनको मैं सिर्फ हिंदी में बयान कर सकती थी, या उसे उर्दू भी कह लें. उर्दू की लिपी तो नहीं आती, पर उत्तर प्रदेश में उर्दू और हिंदी में फर्क करना बढ़ा 'मुश्किल' है।  हिंदुस्तानी कहना ठीक हो सकता है, पर मुझे दोनों भाषाओं के अस्तित्वों को अलग रखना भी अच्छा लगता है।  

Teach for India में पढ़ाते हुए जब कहानियों में Paul और Peter जैसे नाम और 'apple pie ' जैसे शब्द आये तो मुझे लगा की बच्चे शायद वह तस्वीरें अपने जीवन के सन्दर्भ में न खींच पाएं। तब मैंने उन्हें 'ईदगाह' सुनाई। मेरी कक्षा में दीपक 'हामिद' को तुरंत पहचान गया।  हामिद ने अपने खेल के पैसे बचाकर अपनी दादी के लिए चिमटा खरीदा, तो नूर ने आधी छुट्टी में अपने ५ रुपये से बिस्कुट नहीं खरीदे. वह अपनी अम्मी के लिए कुछ खरीदना चाहता था।  मुझे तब यह एहसास हुआ की 'मंत्र' की कहानी ने मेरे ऊपर जो छाप छोड़ी है वह मेरे जीवन दर्शन का कितना बड़ा हिस्सा है। और मेरे आने वाली पीढ़ी के कई लोग शायद उससे वंचित रह जाएँ । क्यूंकि अंग्रेजी माध्यम के स्कूलों में हिंदी बस पास करने का विषय बनकर रह गयी है।  हिंदी में बोले तो ' Black Point' अंग्रेजी सिखाने का अच्छा तरीका हो सकता है , और अंग्रेजी का आना दुनियादारी के सन्दर्भ में बहुत ज़रूरी है पर अपनी भाषाओँ की इज़्ज़त कम नहीं होनी चाहिए।  

भाषा साहित्य में जीवंत रहती है। साहित्य का जितना पढ़ा जाना ज़रूरी है उतना ही लिखा जाना भी ज़रूरी है।  और उतना की आवश्यक है भाषा का इस्तेमाल होना।  किसी भी भाषा का प्रयोग न तो ज़बरदस्ती करना चाहिए , न ज़बरदस्ती बंद करना चाहिए। मुझे हिंदी उतनी अच्छी तरह से नहीं आती।  ICSE  Board में पढ़ने के कारण शेक्सपियर और डिकेन्स से मुखातिब तो हुए लेकिन अज्ञेय सिर्फ एक छोटी कहानी में सिमट गए।  फिर गुलज़ार साहब की ऊँगली पकड़ कर कवियों से मुलाक़ात हुई है, मंटो ने मर्म को हर बार छुआ, हरिवंश राय बच्चन हमराही बन साथ साथ चले।  

सच बहुत मज़ा आया।  

जिन्हें भी लिखने पढ़ने का शौक है, उनसे यह गुज़ारिश है की भारत की दूसरी भाषाओँ में  बहुत कुछ ऐसा है जो शायद अगर हम सिर्फ अंग्रेजी तक सिमट जाए तो छूट जाए।  इस साहित्य को भी थोड़ा पढ़ें।  जो स्कूलों में पढ़ाते हैं, उनसे यह निवेदन है कि अपनी कार्य शैली में ऐसा कुछ न कहें न करें जिससे यह प्रतीत हो की हिंदी या उर्दू या कोई और भाषा कमतर है।  और जिन्हे कई भाषाओँ को जानने और समझने का मौका मिला है, वह अंग्रेजी के अलावा भाषाओँ का भी सम्मान करें।  ताकि हमारे सामने एक हिंदी-भाषी और अंग्रेजी-भाषी सामान्य रूप से सहज महसूस कर सकें। भारत की कई फ़ीसदी जनता अंग्रेजी न आने पर अपने ही देश के किसी शहर में असहज महसूस करती है। इक परिपक्व समाज में ऐसा होना चिंता का विषय है।  

और इस परिस्थिति की कहीं का कहीं मैं भी ज़िम्मेदार हूँ।  

* अगर इसे पढ़कर कहीं ऐसा लगे की मैंने अंग्रेजी के विरोध में बोला है तो मैं क्षमा प्रार्थी हूँ।  मेरा ऐसा कोई आशय नहीं था।
**मुझे हिंदी में गद्य लिखने का अनुभव नहीं है, सीख रही हूँ , गल्तियां बताने से न चूंके   

5 Comments

'Choosing' to not shoot the messenger.

4/1/2015

1 Comment

 
Disclaimer 1 : This article is not on feminism.
Disclaimer 2 : For me 'sex outside of marriage' does not mean adultery, it means to be in an open relationship

The first time I stumbled upon the ‘My Choice’ video by Vogue it did not seem provocative but it did make me google 'sex outside of marriage'. Deepika looked gorgeous of course. Then the video went viral, which it had the potential of.  Following that, its criticisms went viral which was also expected.  So far so good.

Then, all of a sudden a sort of a sort of guerrilla campaign started lashing Deepika, questioning her sense of feminism. Some people who cared to know about the maker, Homi, included him too but most of the criticism is still being hurled against Deepika. Being a public figure, it could be understood as being part of the package. But it did not make sense to me so I put myself in her shoes and tried to make sense of it.

Scenario : I get a call from Vogue saying they an article on women empowerment of 500 words appealing to their clientele. Since I perceive it to be a good opportunity to make money and make a point, I take the job.

The limit on words and my experience of market behaviour guides me to reach out to women who do not have to face scourges of rural India. I reach out to urban women who earn a decent income or are rich by other means, can make some decisions in their lives but feel limited because they have other issues, a bad body-image, lack of sexual freedom, obligations to take a husband's name- things that might seem superficial given the condition of India, but are real world problems. I, for one, would like to keep my name. If you are reading this article, there are fair chances that you might or will face one of these in life. Since the article is in Vogue, I only touch upon these issues.

Reaction 1 : When the article gets published, it is appreciated by some as empowering women which is exactly what I wanted and discarded by others as a banal effort by Vogue for not touching issues that mar 80% of Indian women. Spoofs are made and fun is being poked at the piece.

I accept it with grace. Every piece of work, creative or otherwise garners some criticism because it is limited in scope. Sometimes these limitations are obvious, but most of the times they are hidden.  Any article on a deep issue such as gender-quality is bound to have loopholes, regardless of the intellectual prowess and intention of the writer.

Reaction 2 : When the article gets published, it is appreciated by some as an empowering video while the others blame me for not having any idea of ‘real world problems’. They, morbidly, attach my motivation solely to money and my stupidity. I am called an incorrigible feminist pig too. Also since my main job is that of a bookseller and people only buy gossip magazine at my store despite the fact that I would love them to buy literature, I am being targeted as a money-mongering book seller and writer. They say I would write erotica if I were given enough money to do that ( I am not sure why that is necessarily a bad thing but let us assume it is not great)

It is this extreme sort of reaction against Deepika in context of  the ‘My Choice’ video that I have a difficulty making sense of. 

The worst I can assume of Deepika is that she was paid to do the piece for  Vogue, that being paid was her sole motivation and that she, for similar reasons, does other advertisements that perpetuate patriarchy. Even by that assumption, aren’t we being too harsh on her? She did not claim, as far as I know, that she is a feminist because she did this piece. She just did an advertisement that, if I choose to have the slightest of empathy, she might have likened to activism, because according to me, it does talk about some important things, which her movies for obvious reasons fail to do. Why do we feel the necessity to de-throne Deepika from a place that she never claimed as hers?

Would you and I not do the same, write that article,  make a cartoon, create a song for Vogue if those were our professions and there was some activism involved too ? Some of us might not. But if I know the world well, most of us would.

I know I would write that Vogue article because it is relevant even if ever so slightly and pays too. Very few jobs in the world are meaningful today. Entertaining humanity is not easy, not in India atleast. The rubbish that we see on media is as much a  reflection of our choices as it is the profession's hunger for money. So when something slightly sensible comes along, we should be careful while criticizing it and avoid throwing  the baby out with the bathwater.

As far as Deepika is concerned, she chooses to stay in the industry for exactly the same reasons that most of us find plausible to stay in our jobs. The best paying jobs in the country ask us to promote consumerism, we sell cola to kids at Pepsi, make cigarettes at ITC (which the Indian MPs tell me might not be such a bad thing afterall), do not accept social responsibility for the rigs we dig at BP solely because they pay us well and bring us prestige. Most of us are destroying the world where we try to get a grip on the lavish lives of our dreams. The modern world is a complex set of choices. It would be a great disappointment if we are robbed of meaning in everything we do, because our professions create such a context. Like us, Deepika never claimed she is changing the world with her films. She should be allowed to think that she did something good by being part of something that talks about choices of women, even if it does that for only .1% of women in the country.


Deepika, for all I know, in her capacity tried to do a good thing by participating in this endeavour. While we make sense of the message and its limitations, it is Our Choice to shoot the messenger or judge her gently. 


I hope we make that choice wisely. 
1 Comment

The AAP controversy

3/19/2015

1 Comment

 
When people come together and drive systems that do not have measurable rewards, e.g. money, it becomes all the more difficult for them to stick together. What they look for in the system is a reflection of their own values and principles.Humans differ in their values, sometimes subtly, at others a great deal. While some people would rather be defeated than compromise on their values, others would manoeuvre their way by flexing their values a little here, a little there. The ones that do not compromise their value ensure that a principled policy is in place, the ones that know how to get something done ensure such a policy does not paralyse action.

It is obvious that both are essential.

There is, however, a tendency to see the aggressive man as the sole man of action, and given a hero worship culture, it is not difficult to believe that saner voices might be marginalised in many cases.Since AAP is a recent phenomena of hope, Arvind is a hero to millions of hearts in India. Now that in itself calls for a lot of caution within the party. Few men are capable of handling that kind of power and Arvind for all his qualities, is yet to score on that one.

I am not sure if Yogendra Yadav or Prashant Bhushan are as transparent and value driven as they have appeared to me in the last two years, when I have followed them really closely, but AAP definitely needs to rethink its strategy of tackling dissent. AAP will continue to run with or without both these otherwise extremely brilliant people, but without creating mechanisms to make space for dissent and address it,it would nowhere be close to the party of my dreams.

1 Comment

    Author

    Thoughts about things that matter to me.

    Archives

    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.